Critical evaluation †John Steinbeck-Of Mice and Men and Robert Ludlum-The Bourne Identity Essay

through the hi bosh of man mathematicians, philosophers, teachers, and scientists have molded and shaped our world. These men and women, junior and old, be responsible for the continu e genuinely last(predicate)y growing experience in straight offs y bulge outh. Upon studying the to the highest degree influential educators, it was proven that writers and agents sustain every(prenominal) element of the society we live love, passion, romance, adventure, drama, science fiction, and non-fiction. All of these categories exist for scarce ane direct, to entertain the minds who absorb the material. Entertaining authors make an withdrawional horizontal surface and none other than Robert Ludlum and caper Steinbeck accomplish this feat better.In guild to merely understand these authors thirst to provide edge-of-the-seat entertainment, their past and bear essential be explored. Although these authors lived in two diverse locations, their driving desire for knowledge appears the same. Ludlum and Steinbeck attended college after high school, majoring in English. After graduating from Salinas High condition in 1919, Steinbeck attended Stanford University from 1920-1925. Two years after Steinbeck left to watch his writing cargoner in vernal York, Robert Ludlum was born on whitethorn 25, 1927. Ludlum was educated privately and at the Chesire honorary society, Connecticut. After appearing is school theatricals, he wreaked in the move updy Junior Miss on Broad representation at the old term of sixteen. His degree includes B.A., Wesleyan University, Middlet knowledge, 1951.Having never graduated from Stanford University, Steinbecks life for the most part was low profile even after the publishing of his world-class books, Cup of Gold (1929), The Pastures of Heaven and To a God Unknown, which were all inadequately acknowledged by the literary world. Tortilla Flat (1935) was the noticeable bit point in Steinbecks literary cargoner receiving the California d emocracy Clubs Gold Medal for best novel. Steinbeck continued writing, and The Grapes of indignation (1939) won him the Pulitzer Prize. The Nobel Prize was awarded to John Steinbeck for Literature in 1962 for his realistic as well as imaginative writings, called by a kind-hearted humor and a keen social perception. 1 Twenty-nine Academy Award nominations and four Academy Awards were given for revision of John Steinbecks stories.Literature lost one of its most accomplished and distinguished writers on December 20, 1968, in New York City John Steinbeck died at the age of 66. However, on a much than positive note, New York City was besides the place where literature bore Robert Ludlum. Ludlum bottom of the inning be described as a modern day author. He is a well-known author writing twenty-one novels and selling over 290 million books in xxxii different languages. Ludlum started his literary career relatively late because he was work in1. Mobel Lectures literature 1901-4967the theatre as an actor and producer. One of the unproblematic reasons Ludlum is such a suspenseful writer is due to the fact that he was born in an age where movies grabbed the attention of the public kernel. In the 1950s, Ludlum worked as a stage and television actor. After producing 300 stage productions for New York and regional theatre, Ludlum wrote his first novel, The Scarlatti Inheritance (1971). Few writers are able to obtain global attention using unbelievable eyepatchs that spin into engrossing tales.John Steinbeck and Robert Ludlum are comparable writers. These two authors are very accomplished and their novels reputations chat for themselves. John Steinbecks Of Mice and Men and Robert Ludlums The bourne identity element are the focus of this evaluation. Their works signify literary techniques that contri preciselye to home. The central approximation in Of Mice and Men written by John Steinbeck human dooms are constantly controlled by outside forces. The techniques he uses for example repeat and symbolism are extremely successful in getting across his very cynical hatfuls on this theme. Similar techniques are used in Robert Ludlums The marches indistinguishability. Uniquely writing many of Ludlums techniques are present in his writing, but the lector is too engrossed in the story to recognize them. However, Ludlum writes meticulously in his story p dish outs. When evaluated, the skimer smoke distinguish that repetition and symbolism are likewise used as literary techniques that contribute to theme.Steinbeck and Ludlum use the technique of repetition to effectively build up the finish of the tragedy. In Of Mice and Men, Lennie unwilledly killed his mouse when petting it. This situation repeats itself further in the novel when Slim gives Lennie a puppy. When playing with the animal, Lennie gave the puppy a disciplining thump for biting him and he killed it. An incident, such as this, will be the downfall of George and Lennie. Near the end of the novel, Lennie strokes Curleys wifes hairs-breadth.He holds too tightly and she gets frightened. Lennie was in a panic. 2 Climaxing, he attempts to steady her, Dont you go yellin, he said, and he shook her, and her eubstance flopped like a fish. And then she was still, for Lennie had broken her neck. 2 The repetition of unintentional death foreshadows a shun outcome for Lennie, his sealed fate. This action brought upon his own murder by George who shot him in the bottom of the head out of mercy for everything else that was weak and helpless. In this act of violence, George would not be considered a murderer, in fact, quite the opposite. George, instead, would be deemed a savor because he did Lennie a favor.2. Steinbeck 91The Bourne Identity uses repetition in a comparable fashion. The central character Jason Bourne faces memory loss, crippling him from discovering his true identity. His instincts and newsworthiness help guide him. The quote You are not helpless. Yo u will baring your way. 3 is repeated on several occasions, which foreshadows success on Jasons behalf. Jasons rhetorical behavior when faced with latent hostilityful and difficult situations ends in same violent manner. Bourne grabbed the Frenchman in front of him now, his left strengthen around the mans throat, his right hand tearing at the mans left ear. 4 Without thinking, Jason reacts to the situation with poise and precision. Jasons rhetorical skills evoke his memory enough to enable him to think and act on his own to avoid death or capture. Whenever you observe a stress-and you have the time-do your damndest to project into it. Associate as freely as you can let words and images fill your mind. In them you may find clues.5 This quote is nearly repeated again, Whenever youre in a stress situation-and theres time, of course-do exactly as you would when you project yourself into one youre observing. Let your mind fall free, let whatever thoughts and images that surface come c leanly. Try not to exercise any mental discipline. Be a sponge concentrate on everything and nothing. Specifics may come to you, certain subjugate conduits electricity prodded into functioning. 6 except there is added tactics, which suggests that Jason is constantly learning. Through repetition Jason persistently advances his skills to obtain his past by varying his appearance, Change your hairyou stir your face.7 Soon after his skills advanced, Jason learned that his real take a crap is David Webb who turns out as a young Far East scholar. Webb accredited a new identity from the Central intelligence (CIA) as Jason Bourne, a black ops agent. His primary objective was to kill Carlos, another(prenominal) far more advanced assassin, but was betrayed. As the plot twists, the CIA has given Jason quite a few hoops to jump through for his own survival. The climax builds to this token moment in the novel, when Jason reverses the situation and uses the training the CIA gave him to kill the assassin Carlos. The climax appears to have truth because not only has Jason stopped being on the defensive side of this live or die game, but also his proficient skills have drawn him to his past profession to kill or be killed fate. The interfering CIA has lost control of Bourne however he is drawn back to his past line of work, which could result in death, so he ultimately loses. It could be said that Jason Bourne was born to be a professional assassin under anyones control.3. Ludlum 39, 43, 834. Ludlum 645. Ludlum 506. Ludlum 827. Ludlum 116, 161Another technique that demonstrates John Steinbecks facet of fate is the symbolism. Near the end of the novel, A watersnake glided smoothly up the pool, involved its periscope head from side to side, and it swam the length of the pool and came to the legs of a motionless submarine sandwich that stood in the shallows. A silent head and beak lanced down and force it out by the head, and the beak swallowed the little snake while its quest after waved frantically. 8 The heron, stationary and patient, plays fate, while the watersnake, vulnerable and unaware, its victim. The watersnake would most likely symbolize George. Not only does the Heron symbolize fate, it also symbolizes Lennie the burden to their dream.Steinbeck illustrates his view on fate once more by word choice. haggle like lanced, plucked, and waiting suggest that Steinbeck believes that fate strikes assertively and specifically. Similarly, Robert Ludlum uses symbolism to project the same idea. Symbolism appears not as evident as repetition however, present nonetheless. The CIA seems to be the entity or government corporation that symbolizes fate. both element in the novel can be drawn back to something that the CIA has caused. Ludlum and Steinbeck believe fate to be all the same. In Ludlums case, the CIAs intricate plans and organized operations parallel Steinbecks idea that fate acts in the same manner, assertively and specifically.Of Mice and Men and The Bourne Identity are literally written in identical fashions. Steinbeck and Ludlum use character goaded dialogue to tell the story. The point-of-views transpose between first person (the principal(prenominal) characters) and third person (the narrator). The first person prospective uniquely projects to the reader each of the character thoughts and actions. The first person prospective gives a clean understanding of what exactly will happen, without all of the excess narration. However, the narration does an refined job in describing the setting among other elements, such as unravel between events. The events or chapters are present in both novels. Ludlum uses one-third books within his novel along with thirty five dollar bill chapters because The Bourne Identity is far longer than the six chapters Of Mice and Men.This technique is apparent for the sole purpose of changing locations in the story with ease in The Bourne Identity Jason and his companion travel to diff erent countries, and in Of Mice and Men the only change of location appears within the town and ranch. These two books were written very similarly. two switched between first and third person depending on what the best way to tell the story was. By changing point of views, Ludlum and Steinbeck were able to take on their themes more thoroughly. The technique of changing perspectives allowed the reader to identify with the main characters, but at the same time, know vital information that would be required to understand the story.8. Steinbeck 99Robert Ludlum and John Steinbeck are exceptional authors. There novels The Bourne Identity and Of Mice and Men, respectively, have Robert Lattas praise. Woohoo, right? There are more positive, than negative, statements to be discussed. Particularly, Ludlums story is far more intriguing than Steinbecks. The plot and characters all are attention getters. The idea that a man with no memory has instincts that are above any normal man, and has an swers to every question, except his name, is fascinating. The only downfall to Ludlums work appears to be the length of his novel, five hundred some odd pages, that turns out to be a lot of reading time.Steinbecks novel length however, fits the taste well, only one hundred some pages. The olden story in Steinbecks novel, gets negative feedback because its entire plot stimulated nothing more than closing eye lids. Praising the literary device of repetition, this gave some indication that what was being read over again would prove useful in assembling a critical evaluation essay. The repetition also forces the information into your brain, meaning it holds significance. Moreover, the theme portrayed among these two novels had some relevance with our current lives, which also served another purpose to reading them Overall, the novels ended up balancing one another. A positive recommendation can be made for both these novels because something can be learned.WORKS CITEDLectures, Mobel. Th e Nobel Prize in Literature 1962. online http//www.nobel.se/literature/laureates/1962/press.htmlLudlum, Robert. The Bourne Identity. New York Richard Marek, 1975Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York Penguin Books, 1978