If human nature does alter Essay

What is man temperament? According to an interesting article I render read, humanityity can be insureed in ternary ways mechanistic, mysterian and materialist views of humanity. A mechanistic view sees human beings largely as objects through which nature acts. A mysterian view suggests that there are aspects of human existence not sockable to mere mortals. A materialist view sees mankind as exceptional because gentlemans gentleman, unlike any other beings, possess mind and agency. In Judaism, human nature is the ability to make our own superior and we will all be held responsible for our actions.From a scientific perspective, human nature is the behavior of human being physically, socially and mentally. There are many different interpretations of human nature and it will never have a specific definition. From my omen of view, human nature is how human beings interpret themselves as. Therefore, human nature does alter when we begin to look at ourselves in a new way. In th is essay, I have chosen angiotensin converting enzyme play from The Three Theban Plays by Sophocles Oedipus the King and Death and the maidservant by Ariel Dorfman.Looking at the two tragedies, I am passing play to illustrate how the writers make us look at ourselves in a new way. Searching for the lawfulness is a human nature because every star has curiosity. For example, babies feel curious when seeing new items and try to figure reveal what it is. However, searching for lawfulness is not always beneficial. Sophocles certainly did prove his point through his play, Oedipus the King. Oedipus basically assassinated his father, Laius, acquire his crown and ironically his wife, Oedipus mother, Jocasta.However, Oedipus didnt have any knowledge of this. To remedy the city from the plague, he was desperate to track follow out the murderer of Laius, not knowing that he was the murderer. Throughout the play, Sophocles employs the repetition of sightlessness to associate with the sp iritual blindness of Oedipus to the loyalty. He was not only blinded to the true statement, scarcely as well as the consequences of discovering the truth. Moreover, the repetition of blindness foreshadows that Oedipus will blind himself at the end of the play when he deal the truth and what he had done.He is sightless to the advice of passel attempting to chip off him expiry down the road of destruction. At the beginning of the play, I have already noticed the wide use of blindness in the dialogue Oedipus I would be blind to misery not to pity my people rest at my feet (Pg. 159 L14-15) Oedipus Youve lost your power, treasure-blind, stone-deaf senses, eyes blind as stone (Pg. 181 L421-422) From the quotes mentioned, I could see that the word blind often appears in the dialogues of Oedipus.He told his people of Thebes he wouldnt be blind to misery and promised to save Thebes. However, he is blind to the truth and his identity instead. He insulted Tiresias blindness for u nveil the prophecy and the truth about Oedipus identity which he doubted vigorously. Oedipus abuse to Tiresias has a huge contradiction to his own blindness to the outcome of the discovery. Although Tiresias is physically blind, he wasnt blind to the truth and the effect of revealing it whereas Oedipus wasnt blind, but he couldnt notice the purpose of Tiresias actions and ignore his warnings.The repetition of blindness draws attention of the audience every time the characters say the word. This emphasizes the idea of humans are often blind to themselves, the others and also the truth behind things. When they look to search for the truth, the outcome can be catastrophic Messenger He rips off her brooches, the long gold pins holding her robes he digs them down the sockets of his eyes, (Pg. 237 L1402-1405) Messenger And there we saw the woman hanging by the neck, spinning, singe back end and forth. (Pg.237 L1395-1397) In the exodus of the play, the ending is a disaster, Jocasta h anged herself and Oedipus blinded himself. butness can be harmful sometimes, therefore it is bump to stay the corresponding and be brutish. At least we could be better off and happier because truth sometimes doesnt give us any satisfaction at all. This angrye us to have a whole new experience about the exploration of truth. After studying the play, I would be a good deal objective about my actions and be humble to the others advice, to prevent anything destructive happening. plainly on the other hand, Oedipus is a man of great quality, he had the fearlessness to seek for the truth even though people persuaded him not to because the truth was dangerous. If we are satisfy about the current state and choose to be blind to many truths on the world, there would be no benefit and development at all. There is certainly no an ultimate fare to the question whether or not we should seek for the truth. In Death and the foremost, truth is also an important issue. The scene was set in Chile, which had just received democracy after years and years of dictatorship.Gerardo was appointed to be the Head of the Investigating Commission. The purpose of the commission establishes certain truths in a public way, to become part of official history. However, it only deals with the dead, not people suffered but still alive. Paulina, Gerardos wife, was one of them, she was sick into torture and raped. Ariel Dorfman portrayed Paulina as a desperate person to find out the truth. Paulina is breathing out to search for the truth by all means since she suffered so such(prenominal) annoying and was haunted by the past.The only way to relieve her pain is to attain the truth. She had gained power by holding the gun and transformed into a totally different person. We can identify this by looking at the text Paulina Besides you that if the police do show their noses her Ill put a bullet through his mans head. And then Ill put the gun in my mouth and pull the trigger. (Pg. 18) G erardo My God, Paulina she has never utter like this in her life. According to the quotes above, the gun has given power to Paulina and she had mandate over the man.Paulina had turned into another person, even the way she speaks, that Gerardo didnt severalise anymore. This indicates what truth can do it can drive somebody mad and turns them into a different person. Paulina was so obsessed about the truth that she is voluntary to sacrifice anything If hes innocent? Then hes really screwed. (Pg. 29) In order to know the truth, she is willing to give up her morals. Even though she wasnt sure if Doctor Miranda was really one of the people who tortured her, she had already assumed he is guilty and obligate him to confess by threatening to kill him.Paulina didnt even share if he is innocent or not, she just wanted a justification no matter what, because this is the only way she could reconcile her pain. Perhaps Miranda is guilty, the truth is so thrilling that even me as an audi ence wanted to know it so badly. In the end, nobody knows if justice has been achieved by Paulinas awful actions. The play also exemplify the idea of too much truth may be dangerous. On the way of searching the truth, Paulina didnt urinate that she is destroying many things, their relationships, and Gerardos trust to her etc.Gerardo had already warned her not to hap her pastime of truth Gerardo People can die from an excessive venereal infection of the truth, you know. (Pg. 36) Gerardo could foresee the disastrous outcome of the whole event and tried to stop Paulina continue to look for the truth. It is because Gerardo sensed that too much truth wint do good to all of them. The idea of too much truth is dangerous in Death and the Maiden links back to the idea of the catastrophic consequences of obtaining the truth from Oedipus the King.Paulina and Oedipus are very similar, they action for the truth which they dont know is destructive. Paulina destroyed the relationship in t he midst of Gerardo and herself whereas Oedipus devastated his kingdom, his family and most significantly, he blinded himself. Both tragedies raised our caution to the pursuit of truth, acknowledge us that truth is double-edged, it can favour but also destroy someone. Human cant be too ignorant and also cant know too much truth. It is better to settle for half. as Alfieri puts it in the play A View from the bridgework.